Comparing Composite vs. Traditional Wood Decking: Which is Best for Your Outdoor Space?

Posted on 18/09/2024

Whether you're creating a new outdoor oasis or looking to upgrade an existing one, decking is an essential part of any outdoor living space. It not only adds visual appeal, but also serves as a functional surface for relaxing, entertaining and enjoying the great outdoors. However, when it comes to choosing the right decking material, the decision can be overwhelming. One of the most common debates in the world of decking is between composite and traditional wood options. Both have their pros and cons, and it can be difficult to determine which is best for your outdoor space. In this article, we'll compare composite vs. traditional wood decking to help you make an informed decision for your next decking project.

What is Composite Decking?

Composite decking is a man-made material composed of wood fibers and recycled plastic materials such as polyethylene or polypropylene. It's designed to mimic the look and feel of natural wood while offering increased durability and longevity. Some composite decking products even come with warranties of up to 25 years, making them a popular choice among homeowners.

What is Traditional Wood Decking?

Traditional wood decking is made from natural lumber such as cedar, pine or redwood. It's been used for centuries as a building material due to its strength and aesthetic appeal. While it may require more maintenance than composite decking, some homeowners prefer the classic look and feel that real wood provides.

Durability

When it comes to durability, composite decking has a clear advantage over traditional wood. Its composition makes it resistant to rotting, warping, splintering and insect damage, which are all common issues with traditional wood decking. This makes it a popular choice for areas with high humidity or harsh weather conditions.

On the other hand, traditional wood decking requires regular maintenance in order to keep it in good condition. This includes staining, sealing and periodic replacement of damaged or rotting boards. Failure to properly maintain traditional wood decking can lead to decay, making it a less durable option in the long run.

Aesthetics

When it comes to aesthetics, both composite and traditional wood decking have their own unique appeal. Traditional wood decking offers a classic, natural look that many homeowners love. It also ages gracefully, developing a beautiful patina over time. On the other hand, composite decking is available in a wide variety of colors and styles, giving you more design options for your outdoor space. It's also fade-resistant, which means it will retain its color over time.

Maintenance

As mentioned earlier, traditional wood decking requires more maintenance compared to composite decking. In addition to regular staining and sealing, it's important to clean the deck regularly to prevent debris from building up and causing potential damage. This may involve power washing and scrubbing with specialized cleaning products. On the other hand, composite decking only requires occasional cleaning with soap and water.

Cost

When it comes to cost, traditional wood decking is generally less expensive upfront compared to composite decking. However, factoring in the cost of maintenance and potential replacement over time can make traditional wood decking more costly in the long run. Composite decking may have a higher initial cost, but its durability and low maintenance requirements can make it a more cost-effective choice in the long term.

Pros and Cons

Composite Decking Pros:

• Durable


• Low maintenance


• Wide variety of colors and styles


• Fade-resistant


• Eco-friendly (made from recycled materials)


• No splintering or warping


• No staining or sealing required

Composite Decking Cons:

• Higher initial cost


• Susceptible to scratching and staining


• May become hot to the touch in direct sunlight

Traditional Wood Decking Pros:

• Natural, classic look


• Ages gracefully


• Lower initial cost


• Easily customizable with stains and finishes

Traditional Wood Decking Cons:

• Requires regular maintenance (staining, sealing, cleaning)


• Potential for rotting, warping, and insect damage


• May fade or lose color over time


• Not eco-friendly (wood is a finite resource)


• May require periodic replacement of damaged boards

Tips for Choosing the Right Decking Material

Now that we've compared composite vs. traditional wood decking, here are some tips to help you make the right choice for your outdoor space:

• Determine your budget: Consider not just the upfront cost, but also long-term maintenance and potential replacement costs.


• Evaluate your lifestyle: Do you have kids or pets? Are you planning on hosting large gatherings? These factors can help determine which material is best suited for your needs.


• Consider climate: If you live in an area with harsh weather conditions, composite decking may be a more durable option.


• Think about aesthetics: Do you prefer the natural beauty of wood or the variety of colors and styles offered by composite decking?

The Takeaway

In conclusion, choosing between composite and traditional wood decking ultimately comes down to personal preference and budget. While composite decking offers increased durability and low maintenance requirements, traditional wood decking has a classic and timeless appeal. Consider your specific needs and lifestyle when making your decision, and don't hesitate to consult with a professional to determine the best option for your outdoor space.

In the end, whether you choose composite or traditional wood decking, investing in a quality material will ensure you have an inviting and functional outdoor space that you can enjoy for years to come.